tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5426974.post1497191397922554013..comments2023-05-22T07:37:51.514-07:00Comments on The Concrete Donkey: Bless His Noodly AppendageErichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09819378102315534002noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5426974.post-2522732040842982392007-12-31T07:21:00.000-08:002007-12-31T07:21:00.000-08:00I think you know where I stand. I do not dispute s...I think you know where I stand. I do not dispute science nor do I think creation needs to be taught in schoool. We both see the same facts. My question is why do science teachers need to talk about the orgin of life when they don't know for sure. How is that not different they saying God created everything? Why can't they stick with what is dna, cells, organs, etc. Once they take the leep and Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5426974.post-7916501900399802252007-12-31T00:52:00.000-08:002007-12-31T00:52:00.000-08:00Pure science is developing a theory, then testing ...Pure science is developing a theory, then testing the theory. I'm all for it. <BR/><BR/>It seems that, by suggesting we "stick to pure science," you are saying that the theory of evolution is not science. I know I will not get anywhere with you in an argument, but ID is not science. It does not generate testable hypotheses. It is a belief, not a science.<BR/><BR/>It is fruitless to argue. I will Erichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09819378102315534002noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5426974.post-23778131381520217202007-12-30T20:45:00.000-08:002007-12-30T20:45:00.000-08:00What do you think about just removing any discussi...What do you think about just removing any discussion about origin of life and just stick to pure science? Including macro-evolution.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com